Limited Government – Thunder From Under Sun, 02 Jan 2022 15:57:40 +0000 en-US hourly 1 Limited Government – Thunder From Under 32 32 Whistleblower Warns Baffling Illness Affects Growing Number of Young Adults in Canadian Province | Canada Sun, 02 Jan 2022 14:40:00 +0000

A whistleblower from the Canadian province of New Brunswick has warned that a progressive neurological disease that has baffled experts for more than two years appears to be affecting increasing numbers of young people and causing rapid cognitive decline in some of those afflicted.

Speaking to the Guardian, an employee of Vitalité Health Network, one of the province’s two health authorities, said suspected cases are on the rise and young adults without previous health triggers are developing a catalog disturbing symptoms, including rapid weight loss, insomnia, hallucinations, difficulty thinking and reduced mobility.

The official number of cases under investigation, 48, remains unchanged since it was first announced in early spring 2021. But several sources indicate that the cluster could now number up to 150 people, with a backlog of cases involving young people still requiring assessment. further.

“I am really concerned about these cases because they seem to be changing so quickly,” the source said. “I’m worried about them and we owe them some sort of explanation.”

At the same time, at least nine cases have been recorded in which two people in close contact – but without genetic links – developed symptoms, suggesting that environmental factors may be involved.

  • One suspected case involved a man who developed symptoms of dementia and ataxia. His wife, who was taking care of him, suddenly began to lose sleep and suffered from muscle wasting, dementia and hallucinations. Now his condition is worse than hers.

  • A woman in her 30s has been described as non-verbal, tube-feeds, and drools excessively. Her caregiver, a nursing student in her twenties, has also recently started showing symptoms of neurological decline.

  • In another case, a young mother quickly lost nearly 60 pounds, developed insomnia, and began to hallucinate. Brain imaging showed advanced signs of atrophy.

The Vitalité employee, who asked not to be named because he was not authorized to speak in public and feared repercussions for speaking, said he decided to come forward amid growing concerns about the speed at which young people have deteriorated.

“It is not a disease of New Brunswick,” said the employee. “We are probably the region that raises the flag because we are mainly in a rural setting and in an area where people might be more exposed to environmental factors. “

But in January, the province of New Brunswick is expected to widely announce that the cluster of cases, first made public last year after a media note was leaked, is the result of misdiagnosis, which mistakenly grouped unrelated diseases together.

The Special Neurodegenerative Disorders Clinic, also known as the Mind Clinic, in the city of Moncton is the clearinghouse for referrals from the region as well as neighboring provinces. The potential cases have generally baffled doctors and withstood a battery of standardized neurological tests used to rule out certain conditions.

Using a case description guideline developed by a team of neurologists and epidemiologists, the clinic decides whether patients deserve further investigation or whether they may have a known disease or illness. Determining who’s in the group is subjective, in large part because the brain is notoriously difficult to study. Certainty is often not achieved until after the patient has died and the brain tissue can be fully tested.

Despite the vivid details surrounding the new cases, the province has worked to allay fears. In October, officials suggested the eight fatal cases were the result of a misdiagnosis, saying that instead of suffering from a common neurological disease, the victims died from known and unrelated conditions.

But experts familiar with the cluster are alarmed, in large part because of the age of the patients. Neurological diseases are rare in young people.

“The fact that we have a younger set of patients here argues very strongly against what appears to be the preferred position of the Government of New Brunswick – that cases in this group are grouped together in error,” said a scientist from Canada’s public health agency, which specializes in neurodegenerative diseases, but was not licensed to speak.

In October, the province also said an epidemiological report suggested there was no significant evidence of a known food, behavior or environmental exposure that could explain the disease.

Tim Beatty’s father, Laurie, a retired hardware employee, died in 2019 after the onset of the mental confusion around Christmas marked the start of his rapid deterioration.

Beatty says the family were “stunned” when they learned that her father was one of eight people a pathologist controversially said had been misdiagnosed and instead died of Alzheimer’s disease.

Beatty and her sister have pleaded for their father’s remains to be tested for neurotoxins, including β-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA), which some believe may be the culprit of the disease.

In one study, high concentrations of BMAA were found in lobster, an industry that boosts the economies of many New Brunswick coastal communities. The province’s apparent resistance to testing suspected environmental factors has led to speculation among families that efforts to rule out the existence of a cluster could be motivated by political decision-making.

“If a bunch of people wanted to breed conspiracy theorists, then our government did a tremendous job promoting it,” Beatty said. “Are they just trying to create a narrative for the audience that they hope we absorb and move away from?” I just don’t understand it.

Documents obtained through freedom of information requests and seen by the Guardian showed scientists at the country’s public health agency saw BMAA as a possible cause, but needed the province to order testing .

“I don’t know why the province wouldn’t just do the science and watch. They have my father’s remains. We gave them full permission to do toxicology and do what needs to be done, ”Beatty said. “Yet nothing was examined.”

But experts nevertheless warn that the test itself is also more difficult than the public realizes.

While some medical tests can provide quick and accurate results, other types of investigation require a lot more work.

“What people are talking about really amounts to a full research investigation because then we know exactly what we are looking for,” said the federal scientist who was familiar with both the cluster and the testing process. “Right now, we have no way of interpreting the simple data you might get by testing a person’s brain tissue for a particular toxin. For example, how high are the “high” levels of a neurotoxin compared to the rest of the public? And when does this become a cause for concern? “

The scientist said the teams were ready to start the research, but “New Brunswick specifically told us not to go ahead with this work.”

Those familiar with the cluster are bracing for a January report, written by the province’s watchdog committee, which will determine whether the 48 cases are actually suffering from a neurological disease or the result of a misdiagnosis by neurologists.

Amid mounting tensions between specialists and the provincial government, a source close to the Mind Clinic said that postings for several positions at the clinic – a social worker, administrator and neuropsychologist – were recently made temporary, budget would no longer be recurring and the clinic would be converted into an Alzheimer’s and geriatrics clinic. Health Minister Dorothy Shephard told reporters on December 1 that speculation about the clinic closing was false.

“We keep telling patients that the country is behind them and that the tests will be done so that we can understand this. We tell them that we are going to get to the bottom of things to be able to help them, ”said the Vitalité employee. “And so far that has not happened. But they need us.

Source link

]]> nrl: Nrl takes 18,000 crore loan for expansion | Guwahati News Fri, 31 Dec 2021 22:34:00 +0000 Guwahati: Numaligarh Refinery Limited has achieved financial close on its upcoming 6 MMTPA refinery expansion project by linking project debt of Rs 18,904 crore with a consortium of 12 lending banks led by the State Bank of India. This is the largest single borrower fundraiser in North East India.
NRL, co-owned by Oil India Limited, the Government of Assam and Engineers India Limited, is pursuing an integrated mega refinery capacity expansion project to triple its refining capacity from 3 MMTPA to 9 MMTPA at a cost of Rs 28,026 crore. As part of the project, the company is also laying an oil pipeline (approximately 1,640 km) from Paradip, Odisha, to Numaligarh, as well as a crude oil import terminal at Paradip for the reception of imported crude.
LNR (Corporate Communications) Deputy Director General Madhuchanda Adhikari Choudhury, in a statement, said the loan agreement signing ceremony was held in Guwahati on Thursday in the presence of senior officials from all banks. from the member consortium, representatives of Oil India Limited, the Assam government and other stakeholders.
OIL CMD and president of NRL, SC Mishra, in his audiovisual message pledged to provide continued support to this endeavor.
SBI Chairman Dinesh Kumar Khara, in his audio-visual message, expressed his joy at being the main banker that has fueled the Northeast’s growth story through the Numaligarh refinery expansion project. Source link

Biden administration asks Supreme Court to intervene in Remain-in-Mexico legal battle Thu, 30 Dec 2021 03:27:55 +0000

The Justice Ministry on Wednesday asked the Supreme Court to intervene in a trial this has forced U.S. border officials to resuscitate a Trump administration program that forces migrants to wait in Mexico for their asylum hearings.

Citing “flawed” lower court rulings that mandated the revival of border policy, government lawyers representing the Biden administration said the case should be swiftly reconsidered by the Supreme Court, urging the conservative-leaning high court to hold oral argument in April.

At the center of the Justice Department’s request are two lower court rulings against the Biden administration’s attempts to end the so-called Remain-in-Mexico policy, officially called the Migrant Protection Protocols, or MPP.

In August, Republican officials in Texas and Missouri convinced a federal judge to order the Department of Homeland Security to reinstate the Remain-in-Mexico protocols, which were suspended hours after President Biden took office in January.

US Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, appointed by former President Donald Trump, ruled that Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas did not sufficiently explain the end of the policy. He also found that the termination led the United States to violate a law that governs the detention of certain migrants.

The Biden administration quickly appealed the decision, and in late October Mayorkas released a new, more comprehensive notice of termination, arguing that the “unjustifiable human costs” of the policy on asylum seekers stranded in dangerous Mexican border towns outweighed its role in deterring migrants from traveling to the United States

But the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals earlier this month rejected the Biden administration’s appeal and upheld Kacsmaryk’s decision. In a scathing opinion, a panel of Republican-appointed judges declined to consider Mayorkas’ second sack attempt, dismissing the administration’s argument that the new memo rendered the case moot.

To comply with court orders, the Biden administration re-launched a version of the Remain-in-Mexico rules in El Paso, Texas, earlier this month. U.S. authorities have so far returned 200 adult asylum seekers to Mexico as part of the relaunched program, according to the International Organization for Migration, which treats migrants.

Justice Department attorneys said on Wednesday lower court rulings, if upheld, would force the administration to continue the retention policy in Mexico until the Mexican government ceases to cooperate or Congress allocates enough funds to detain most migrants who reach the US border. .

In short, the lower courts ordered DHS to implement and enforce the short-lived and controversial MPP program in perpetuity, ”government lawyers wrote.

The Biden administration has asked the Supreme Court to review the Fifth Circuit’s interpretation of a law governing the detention of migrants, as well as its decision to ignore Mayorkas’ second termination memo.

After launching the MPP in 2019, the Trump administration returned 70,000 migrants to Mexico, where many found themselves awaiting their hearings in U.S. court in squalid camps or places plagued by criminality and violence. cartels. Hundreds of people said they were assaulted, kidnapped or otherwise victimized while waiting in Mexico.

While Biden and progressive supporters have sharply criticized the policy, the Trump administration argued that the program effectively reduced border apprehensions by deterring migrants who were not entitled to U.S. asylum from traveling to the United States. North.

The Biden administration has so far limited returns under reinstated rules from staying in Mexico to Ciudad Juárez, Mexico, but the policy is expected to be extended to the southern border in the coming weeks.

Haitian families cross the Rio Bravo river
Haitian families illegally cross the Rio Bravo River to surrender to US authorities at the Ciudad Juarez border in Mexico with El Paso, Texas.

Christian Torres / Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

To address concerns raised by the Mexican government, the Biden administration made several changes to the protocols before restarting them during the first week of December, including expanding the categories of at-risk asylum seekers who cannot be returned to Mexico.

The American authorities also offer migrants to be vaccinated against COVID-19[female[feminine and ask them if they fear being hurt in Mexico before sending them there.

While the reinstatement of the Remain-in-Mexico rules was ordered by the court, the Biden administration retained another Trump-era border restriction that allows the United States to expel adults and families quickly. migrants to Mexico or their country of origin without examining them for asylum.

The Biden administration has argued that the pandemic era policy, known as Title 42, is needed to prevent coronavirus outbreaks inside migrant detention facilities along the US-Mexico border. .

Source link

A Guide to Giving – The New York Times Tue, 28 Dec 2021 11:08:35 +0000

The end of the year is a time when people often evaluate their charitable giving and make final donations. We know that choosing where to give can sometimes seem overwhelming. Today’s newsletter is meant to help you.

Below, you’ll find tips and ideas for articles in The Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Detroit News, Mashable, and more.

How do you maximize the impact of your donations, especially if you can’t afford to give in large amounts? Farhad Manjoo, a Times Opinion columnist, has an answer: use a service called GiveWell.

“Each year, GiveWell distills its in-depth research into a list of the best charities – the organizations that do the most good in the world (in terms of lives saved or improved) at the least cost,” writes Farhad. GiveWell’s recommendations tend to be concentrated in the poorest parts of the world, where even small donations can do a lot of good.